Not likely, seeing as how there is
no New World Order.
It's a case of semantical confusion, I'm quite sure of it.
No one in the "straight" world uses the phrase "new world order" to
denote world government.
You know the quotes. President Bush the First kicked it off,
right?
But I believe he meant only a
change in the world order.
To most of us, "new world order" means a
change in the world order,
with no implication of world government whatsoever.
Gotchya! The same applies to the other known instances of bigwigs
"spilling the beans."
I've always thought it was lame that the clever globalists keep
blurting things out. Or that they like to brag, & still
nobody outside the conspiracist community "knows."
Hmph!
Ha! Foh!
Anyway, I'm contending that the conspiracy people have somewhat
obtusely missed this basic distinction. Is the guy really talking
about one-world government?
Listening to what they were saying, I would say not.
In my mind, the conspiracy guys MISREAD THE UNIVERSE.
So to speak.
But getting back
to my being an agent...
I dunno. Can you ever prove you're not
something? It would
be an assignment with an exceedingly thin cover, don't you think?
I would definitely demand a lot more money. I would definitely
demand there be money, as there is in fact no damned money.
I don't want to
talk about it, all right!?
I'm sorry I swore back there. The point being that if I worked
for the globalists I would want a very good dental plan, & maybe
some technical assistance with my cable TV show.
Pretty lame cover, you'll have to admit.
This brings up another point suggesting there is in fact no New World
Order. If anyone has a phone number where I can aply for work as
a globalist, please let me know.
There is no such phone number, you'll note. That's because the
globalists don't exist.
I am therefore not an agent. I'll swear to it!
If I worked for them, I'm sure they would not have done such a lousy
job of hiding their evidence in 9-11.
In case you're new to the genre, the conspiracists weave an epic story
of deceit as to 9-11. To them, the most incompetent
administration in American history brought off 9-11 as an inside
job...fooling everyone in the world except you-know-whom.
"You-know-whom." Check it out!
Well, there you go: another proof of nonexistence falls into our laps,
to wit, the clever globalists could not have covered their tracks so
poorly with the 9-11 thing.
You seeeee....!?
Take the small hole in the Pentagon, the absence of wreckage around the
Pentagon, et al.
The conspiracist story has a missile or robot plane crashing into the
Pentagon. Am I the only one in the world who wonders why they
would do it that way? Don't the globalists do things for specific
reasons? More importantly, could they possibly have been so bad
at covering the evidence? Why weren't they better prepared?
This was a planned operation, wasn't it?
But the conspiracy guys never go that way. They just think
differently from you & me.
I would never be an agent to such a clumsy outfit, I assure you.
