|
If 9-11 was a government plot:
Why would they pull off such an absurdly tricky job, when a few drops of dioxin in the water supply would do the trick much better? Conspiracy buffs have no sense of proportion.
Their 9-11 scam is just too complex & baroque. A moment's reflection suggests it would never get off the drawing board. Why would international bankers pull off a job that would close down Wall Street? (You see what I mean? They most certainly wouldn't close down the financial center of the world. They would have set the planes elsewhere, you silly-billies! This is definitely a BAD MOVIE SCRIPT we have here. It's a story written by guys who can't write stories.) Why has no one in the world come forward & said "I was involved in 9-11"? (There'd be plenty of money in it, & the New World Order guys say you're safe if you come out in the open.) Why has no one involved in the conspiracy contacted any of the conspiracy guys? (They haven't contacted me, either. I'll let you know if they do--after verifying the claims. Then I can cross over & become pro-conspiracy. How cool would that be?) Why have no structural engineers spoken out about why the towers collapsed? (Conspiracy buffs keep telling me there are engineers who back them up, but I can't find any of them. The closest thing is a guy who was misquoted. I myself have found real engineers who see no plot. As far as I can determine, no real engineers see bombs in the buildings or any of that.) Why haven't airline pilots spoken out about NORAD standing down, if it was all so fishy? (I even heard a guy who said he was an airline pilot try to get through to Alex Jones & George Humphrey, on their respective ACTV shows. The man said he was an airline pilot, & he was trying to tell them how their theory about NORAD standing down on 9-11 was bogus. Interestingly, neither Alex nor George allowed the guy to speak. They hung up on him.) Why was the collapse of WTC7 allowed on TV, if the perps wanted to hide their evidence? (Think about it. The perps could have set charges in WTC7 so as to make it look like the building really collapsed. If it were a conspiracy, Building 7 would not have so obviously LOOKED like controlled demolition. This is an argument most conspiracy guys will not be able to follow, but I put it here to get it off my chest. I feel much better.) Why are there so many eyewitnesses to commercial planes hitting the Pentagon? (Also, wouldn't they have silenced/rubbed out the people who thought they saw a missile or a drone?) Why, yes they would! Why would the perps be so foolish as to warn people about coming to New York on 9-11? Why would they risk the whole plan to save one novelist, for example? (Again, conspiracy people have limited powers of dialectical thinking, & wil not understand this point. I guess I'm just purging my own soul right now.) Why didn't the perps have bodies & wreckage placed around the Pentagon? (Did they forget? Are they incompetent?) Why didn't the perps simply fake a tape of the planes hitting the Pentagon? (I thought they could fake tapes of anything. That's what Alex Jones tells me on his show. If they can fake tapes of anything, why bother to ask them for tapes? Come to think of it, if they can fake tapes of any old thing, doesn't the failure to produce a tape prove their innocence, rather than their guilt? Don't try to figure this one out, conspiracy people.) Why did the President go into brainlock when he got the news, seeing as how he was behind it? (Here again, the whole concept of 9-11 as an inside job totally falls apart, & we have to seriously believe the perps would forget to have their big puppet ready for the show. The conspirators sound dumb, because the guys making up the cockamamie story are dumb. Just an opinion.) Why didn't the government fly the bin Laden family out BEFORE 9-11, if they were planning the whole thing? (It's a scenario problem, you see. The coinspirators sound like total dimwits, as with this business of flying the Bin Laden family out. They would most certainly have gotten them out beforehand. Even dimwits would do that.) Why has the government--which threatened us with many more attacks after 9-11--not bring off any more attacks? (Why would they make empty threats, when what was needed was to press the advantage with fresh instances of terror. But there was no more domestic terror. The conspiracy guys were wropng, but they won't cop to it. Hu! Sure sign of a LAMEASSED
PARADIGM!
Why did we have so many fake terror attacks, when fresh terror was available? (Same thing. The imaginary perps would not have to fake up terror alerts, which eventually lower the degree of fear, rather than raise it. The conspiracy paradigm does not explain the facts very well.) Why were stories about "prior knowledge" not suppressed in the media (since they control the media)? ("Prior knowledge" makes the adminstration look dorky, which is opposite to what the scam was about.) Why would there even be instance of "prior knowledge"? ("Prio knowledge" is logically inconsistent with its being an inside job. If you're pulling off a scam, you arrange so as not to have your own people, incessantly warning you!) Why have no 9-11 conspiracy theorists been shut down by the perps? Why was the most incompetent administration in American history suddenly able to bring off the most complicated hoax ever? Haven't you noticed these guys
could not run an elevator, much less a country? Would they be stupid enough to carry out a plan that required NORAD to stand down, when this would quickly be detected & give away the whole plan? (This is the now-familiar BAD COMIC BOOK motif.) How could they be stupid enough to carry out a plan that was impossible (e.g., the plane knocking the buildings down), when this would surely be detected? Why are the only people who have figured all this out ANGRY WHITE GUYS WITH IQ'S IN THE MID-80'S? (Just kidding.) Why have there been no further domestic attacks (i.e., staged follow-up attacks) in the four years since 9-11? (Answer: because 9-11 was not an inside job. Now go read a book.) |